The labor negotiations have begun. The current Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) that governs the relationship between MLB and the MLB Players Association (MLBPA) is set to expire this upcoming December, and accompanied with that looming deadline are concerns of a lockout. The owners and MLB are expected to push hard for a salary cap amid the growing financial disparity in the sport. The players, on the other hand, see a salary cap as something that can only hurt their earning power, and therefore are expected to be staunch opponents of any proposal that includes one.
Thankfully, for fans who simply want to see baseball played in 2027, the two sides have already begun negotiating, and their proposals are being publicized by league insiders. ESPN's Jeff Passan reported the MLBPA's initial proposal on the social media platform X yesterday afternoon and included components like an increase in the league minimum salary, a minimum arbitration salary, and a major increase to the pre-arbitration bonus pool.
- Changes to the revenue-sharing system that would distribute more money from local television revenue but decrease the amount distributed from in-stadium revenue -- to incentivize teams that win and draw larger crowds
— Jeff Passan (@JeffPassan) May 27, 2026
- Free agency for players who are 30 at 5+ years of service
It's most certainly an aggressive proposal from the MLBPA, led by Bruce Meyer, who took over as the interim executive director back in February after his predecessor, Tony Clark, resigned from the role. However, with months until the new CBA needs to be agreed upon, it's unsurprising that such an aggressive first proposal was made. This is simply the MLBPA's starting point, and negotiations are likely to alter or eradicate many of their proposed changes.
On Thursday afternoon, MLB clapped back with their first proposal, and it unsurprisingly included both a salary cap and floor. As reported by Passan's colleague at ESPN, Jesse Rogers, MLB's first proposal includes a $171.2 million floor and a $245.3 million ceiling. Like the MLBPA's first offer, it's a shocking proposal -- limiting the discrepancy in payrolls between the highest and lowest spenders to just more than $70 million when it is currently more than $300 million would be a significant change to the sport.
However, while the $245.3 million number will almost certainly increase, the MLBPA will likely do whatever they can to keep the salary floor figure in place. In simple terms, a salary floor is good for players who want to increase their salaries because it forces teams that currently spend less than they could to invest more in their payroll, which theoretically leads to more money in the players' pockets.
When it comes to the Milwaukee Brewers, the salary floor figure is really the only one fans need to be concerned with. Milwaukee, existing in the smallest TV market in baseball, is unlikely to ever approach a payroll even remotely close to the initially proposed $245.3 million salary cap, but seeing as they currently spend less than the proposed salary floor, they may nevertheless be impacted.
Brewers' payroll spending almost gauranteed to increase if MLB does end up implementing a salary floor
According to FanGraphs' roster resource tool, the Brewers currently have a payroll of $131 million in 2026. It's not the largest payroll in franchise history; that would be their $138 million roster in 2022, but it is higher than 11 other teams in 2026. However, even their largest payroll back in 2022 doesn't come close to the proposed $171.2 million salary floor that MLB proposed earlier today.
Imagine what the Brewers would look like with $40 million more invested in their club. That's almost twice the amount of Brandon Woodruff's 2026 salary, which was the largest single-season salary ever handed out to a Brewers pitcher. It's the current average annual salary of 3x MVP Aaron Judge. The Brewers have been a perennial playoff contender with a $120-130 million salary for the last eight years; what would they look like with a 30-35% larger payroll?
Now, let's not get ahead of ourselves. Any salary floor that the two parties do agree upon is likely to be associated with increased expenditures for teams elsewhere. Whether that comes in the form of increased league minimum salaries, less time spent in the arbitration process, or changes in the free agent market, the Brewers aren't simply going to have an extra $40 million to spend each season. Additionally, it's unlikely the salary floor figure, if it is passed, ends up at $171.2 million.
However, it's still fun to imagine how the Brewers could use that money if a salary floor does end up being implemented. Do they become bigger players on the free agent market? Do they end up extending their young stars like Brice Turang and William Contreras? These are questions that won't have answers for quite a while and involve the salary floor first being passed, which is a long way from happening. That said, a salary cap is something both the league and players can seemingly get behind, and it's likely to only increase the Brewers' payroll spending.
