Brewers: The Worst Offseason Move In The Last 10 Years
The Milwaukee Brewers have had a lot of success in recent years. They've made the postseason four times but they also went through a rebuilding cycle within the last decade.
The front office has made a lot of transactions over the last decade. With transactions comes praise and/or criticism. Was it a good move or was it a bad move? More often than not they've turned out to be good moves, but in this article we're going to focus on the bad moves. Specifically, we're going to determine which was the worst move of the last decade.
Which Brewers move was the worst decision the organization has made in the last 10 years?
(Dis)Honorable Mentions
Not every bad move can be declared the worst move, which leads us to the moves worth mentioning but not quite taking the title.
The Khris Davis trade
David Stearns didn't make a lot of bad trades when he was in charge of the Brewers. In his first offseason at the helm, Stearns traded outfielder Khris Davis to the Oakland A's for Jacob Nottingham and Bubba Derby. Nottingham was supposed to be the catcher of the future and Derby a valuable depth arm. Instead Nottingham failed to hit and couldn't cement himself in a big league role and Derby wasn't able to sniff the 40 man roster. Meanwhile Davis went on to have a number of successful seasons as a DH in Oakland.
At the time, the Brewers didn't have a DH role to offer Davis, who was atrocious defensively in the outfield but always had power. The trade made sense at the time, and it was seen as a solid return for a player without a defensive home, but with Davis thriving for a number of years in Oakland and the Brewers return busting, it goes down as a bad move, but the circumstances make it not quite the worst one.
The Neftali Feliz signing
Remember him? Back in 2017, the Milwaukee Brewers signed former Rangers closer Neftali Feliz to be their closer. They signed him to a one year, $5.35MM deal with incentives worth another $1.5MM. Let's just say Feliz didn't reach those incentive bonuses.
The plan was for Feliz to be the new Brewers closer. They had just traded away Jeremy Jeffress and Will Smith at the previous trade deadline and Tyler Thornburg was dealt earlier in the offseason. They needed a closer and Feliz had experience.
The Feliz contract was $5.35 million well wasted. He gathered just eight saves, posting a 6.00 ERA in 29 games and was released in mid-June. It could not have gone more wrong, but at least it was only a one year deal.
(Dis)Honorable Mentions
The Jackie Bradley Jr signing
The main thing keeping the Jackie Bradley Jr signing from being declared the worst move of the last decade is the fact that the Brewers were able to get out from under his contract after just one year and acquire Hunter Renfroe for him in a trade with the Red Sox.
At the time, Jackie Bradley Jr was the best free agent left on the market as spring training got underway. The Brewers already had a full outfield but decided to bring in Bradley on a two year, $24MM deal with a mutual option for a 3rd year and a player option on the 2nd year.
Bradley proceeded to put up one of the worst offensive seasons in living memory. He hit just .163/.236/.261 with a 35 OPS+. League average OPS+ is 100 by the way. This signing was a disaster, but somehow they were able to salvage some trade value and send him along with two prospects back to Boston for a productive hitter in Hunter Renfroe. Not having to see another season of Bradley attempting to hit in a Brewers uniform saved this move from being the worst of the decade.
Signing Matt Garza to a 4 year contract
Brewers owner Mark Attanasio wanted to make a splash. Matt Garza was a hot commodity at the trade market in July and he had pitched well for the Cubs for the last couple of years. So, right before Brewers On Deck in 2014, they signed Matt Garza to a four year, $50MM contract.
However, the Brewers didn't expect Garza to fall off so quickly. He put up solid numbers in 2014 with a 3.64 ERA in 163.1 IP, but it went downhill fast after that.
Garza had an unsightly 5.63 ERA in 25 starts in 2015, followed by a 4.51 ERA in 2016 and a 4.94 ERA in 2017. The Brewers eventually demoted him to the bullpen, which he didn't like, and he was sent home before the season was over. Garza struggled so much that even though the Brewers entered a rebuilding period in 2015 and traded away as many veterans as they could, no one would take Garza. They couldn't move him.
One year was good, three years were bad and the Brewers were stuck paying the rest of his contract.
The worst Brewers offseason move of the last decade
Selecting Wei Chung Wang in the Rule 5 Draft
The selection of Wei Chung Wang in the Rule 5 Draft in December 2013 ranks as the worst Brewers move of the offseason for a couple of reasons.
The first reason is how insanely stupid of an idea this was from the start. Wei Chung Wang was a 21 year old who had never even thrown a pitch in full season ball. He had one minor league season under his belt when they drafted him. One season and it was in the rookie-level Gulf Coast League. He threw 47.1 IP there with a 3.23 ERA. The Brewers inexplicably felt that because Wang had one good season as a 21 year old in short-season rookie ball that he was ready for a big league bullpen role.
Typically a player like this could be drafted in the minor league phase of the Rule 5 Draft and no one would bat an eye, or if they do draft a guy this far away from the big leagues in the major league portion they usually return him in spring training after they realize he isn't ready. But nope, not the Brewers.
The Brewers decided to keep Wang, whom they very quickly realized was unplayable in anything but extreme mop-up duty. Wang pitched in just 14 games and had a 10.90 ERA. Because they couldn't trust him to get into a game and they didn't want to send him back, the Brewers bullpen was essentially operating down a man all season long.
That forced the usable relievers to be over-used by manager Ron Roenicke. In July, shortly after passing the threshold of being on the active roster long enough that an IL stint doesn't affect his Rule 5 status, Wang came down with an injury that the Brewers took their time with getting him back from, but it was too late.
The overuse on the rest of the group early on led to the bullpen struggling down the stretch, which was a major factor in the 2014 Brewers as a whole collapsing down the stretch. They were in first place almost the entire season. They fell apart at the end because their entire bullpen was gassed. They were gassed because they were a man down. They were a man down because the Brewers opted to keep a pitcher who had never pitched above rookie ball on the roster.
The 2014 collapse is one of the worst of all time and is a dark era in many Brewers fans' memories that they try to forget. That collapse led to the rebuild process formally starting in 2015. That collapse cost Ron Roenicke his job. That collapse wasted a Top 5 MVP season from Jonathan Lucroy and cost the Brewers a very good chance they had at a postseason run that year. Maybe Lucroy would've finished higher or even won had his team not ended up missing the playoffs.
The lynchpin to all of that was the selection of Wei Chung Wang. The cost of this move is immeasurable. While we can measure that the Garza signing cost the team $50MM that wasn't put to good use, how can you compute what Wang cost the Brewers? He didn't earn a big salary, but how much money did they lose by not getting to the playoffs that year? Postseason home games earn a lot of revenue, extra TV revenue, ticket sales, etc.
It was all so avoidable. Wang was 21 years old, had one season of rookie ball under his belt, and was nowhere close to being ready for the big leagues. It made zero sense to draft a guy like that in Rule 5 and even less sense to actually try to carry him through the season when it was so obvious he wasn't ready, At least signing Matt Garza made some sense at the time. Signing JBJ made some sense, not a lot but some. All these dishonorable mentions you could at least justify them making at the time. But Wei Chung Wang, there was no justification for making this move to start with.